Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closure conversion: don't erase type parameters #29181

Closed
chloestefantsova opened this issue Mar 28, 2017 · 0 comments
Closed

Closure conversion: don't erase type parameters #29181

chloestefantsova opened this issue Mar 28, 2017 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
area-front-end Use area-front-end for front end / CFE / kernel format related issues. front-end-kernel

Comments

@chloestefantsova
Copy link
Contributor

Support for generic types and type parameters is temporarily disabled for closure conversion. The erasure pass is performed before it, so closure conversion doesn't have to deal with type parameters. This change should be reverted when the new changes, i.e. using Vectors for contexts and top-level function instead of closure classes, take effect.

@chloestefantsova chloestefantsova self-assigned this Mar 28, 2017
@chloestefantsova chloestefantsova changed the title Closure conversion: don't erase type parameters before closure conversion pass Closure conversion: don't erase type parameters in closure conversion pass Jun 22, 2017
@chloestefantsova chloestefantsova changed the title Closure conversion: don't erase type parameters in closure conversion pass Closure conversion: don't erase type parameters Jun 22, 2017
@kmillikin kmillikin added area-front-end Use area-front-end for front end / CFE / kernel format related issues. front-end-kernel and removed area-front-end Use area-front-end for front end / CFE / kernel format related issues. labels Sep 19, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-front-end Use area-front-end for front end / CFE / kernel format related issues. front-end-kernel
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants